The Perils of Investor Overconfidence

Published by: Jose Ortiz

September 21, 2022 | TruStage, Uncategorized

Economic Insights provided by Scott D. Knapp, Chief Market Strategist at CUNA Mutual Group

Economists and investment strategists are said to suffer from a malady known as “physics envy.” The physical universe is governed by laws that create certainty about the outcome of an action. If a ball is released from a roof, it will fall to Earth every time due to the law of gravity. In economics and finance, no laws exist. Only econometric models are available, and none of them rival the laws of physics as forecasting tools.

In most cases, econometric models attempt to make sense of historical data by identifying what looks like relationships between variables. When A happened, B followed. If a relationship is real and persists, current data indicate what will happen in the future. But what looks like historical relationships are often mere coincidences within randomness. Sadly, that means all economic and financial market forecasting is a low-confidence endeavor, even under the best circumstances.

Physicists use laws that guarantee future outcomes. Envious economists and investment strategists use models that leave the future shrouded in ambiguity. This can be unsatisfying, so many of them inappropriately present their forecasts with physics-like certainty. We have seen a lot of that lately.

For several months, rising inflation was characterized by most economists as a transitory condition attributable to the pandemic. In particular, the U.S. Federal Reserve said with high confidence that inflation would soon pass, and that a policy response to end it was unnecessary. The Fed relied heavily on econometric models when making that declaration. There is no problem with doing so because models are the only tools at the central bank’s disposal. Their error was in the confidence with which they communicated their forecast.

We commented about the Fed’s missteps in this excerpt from our 2022 Letter to Investors:

If the Fed with its access to real-time information and legions of staff PhD economists cannot confidently predict inflation rates, neither can anyone else. It erred when it implied it could. Investors took their word for it and acted based on misplaced belief.

This might seem like water under the bridge, but the implications of overconfidence live on. Many of the same economists who said inflation was transitory now confidently declare it to be peaking. Others confidently declare it to be an entrenched problem that can only be fixed by demand-killing financial conditions imposed by the Fed. Both camps are evaluating the same data, yet their models forecast different outcomes. Imagine if some physicists said a dropped ball would fall and others said it would rise!

In reality, no one knows with certainty or even high confidence how the trajectory of inflation or the economy will change in coming months. Big short-term investment bets based on econometric models or advice from experts derived from their models are darn close to gambling. The problem is amplified by investors who frequently react to models that confirm their biases. To them, data serves as a Rorschach inkblot test.

Even so, investing is a forward-looking endeavor that makes prognostication about the future an inherent part of the process. And there is certainly much to contemplate. Again, excerpting our 2022 Letter to Investors:

With history as our guide, we know crisis conditions always lead to societal change…The pandemic qualified as a crisis by every measure, so it is not surprising that big changes occurred in response. In our view, some of the change redirected our journey to our long-term future…

Given that, robust scenario analyses are essential in the post-pandemic world, even though they will provide limited insights due to high uncertainty. Base cases should have lower than usual confidence, and alternatives to the base case should cover a very wide range of possibilities.

All we can say with modest confidence is the economy’s path has indeed changed. The probability of more inflation and tighter financial conditions into the extended future is higher than before. Financial markets could produce real returns that are lower than during the past several disinflationary years.

More than anything else, investors should acknowledge that the start of a major paradigm shift is only identifiable as a distant image in the rearview mirror. Until then, remember that in economics and finance a dropped ball can rise.

Learn more by checking out CUNA Mutual Group’s year-end letter to investors and 2022 outlook.

Contact Jose Ortiz for questions or assistance.

Jose Ortiz
Jose Ortiz Sr. Business Solutions Manager E:
Contact Us

Other Movement News

Government Affairs

Advocacy on track at Churchill Downs

Ohioans and communities are best served when credit unions and regulators work together to cultivate a financial services industry that puts people first. That is why the Ohio Credit Union […]

League advocates for an updated CTR threshold

Constantly increasing regulatory pressures put a strain on a credit union’s resources and ability to focus on what matters most: serving members; thus, the League is always looking for opportunities […]
Member Benefits

Unlocking Strategic Insights with Peer Suite

Data-driven decision-making is paramount for credit unions striving to grow and better serve their members. Recognizing this need, the League offers Peer Suite as a powerful member benefit. This comprehensive […]